cover_issue_7_en_US-1-1

Volume 1, Issue 4 (July 2022)

Authors' Guidelines
PDF
Make a Submission
Other Format
Novel Semi-Automated Design for Determination of Iron in Water using Smartphone Camera Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) Biosensor as a Detector Device
Mustafa Abdulkadim Hussien
 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Kufa - Iraq
Hassan Hadi Kadhim
 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Kufa - Iraq
 mustafa.rabeea@uokufa.edu.iq
 Corresponding Author
ISSN(e): 2790-296X
ISSN(p): 2957-5826
About the Journal
Editor in Chief:
Prof. Dr. Emad Al-Mulla
 
Frequency:
BCS is published quarterly
 
Publisher:
 
Co-Publisher:
 
Editorial Office:
Commercial Plot 33 Millennium Plaza, G-15 Markaz, Margalla 02, Islamabad, Pakistan

In this research, a new method was used to determine the amount of iron in water, by using the colour biosensor of the smart-phone device as a biosensor for the chromatic intensity of the samples images that are examined through a program (colour meter) downloaded to the phone. The concentration of the samples is measured from the value of the basic colours (red, green, blue) (RGB) for recorded video from a device (Galaxy J7 prime 2). An accessory for the mobile device is designed from plastic (black acrylic). In the form of a dark box from the inside equipped with a flow cell and a mirror reflecting the flash light emitted by the mobile device and a green filter complementing the red colour, and a micro switch connected to a smart-phone device via earphones, and the device is attached to the accessory by the device case. The calibration curve for this method was in the range of mg/L (1-8), the correlation coefficient (R2 ) was equal to (0.999), the limit of detection was in the amount of (0.2) mg/L, and the relative standard deviation (RSD%) for the concentration was (4) mg/L, for which the examination was repeated (10) times, and its value was (0.6 %), and the recovery value (Recovery%) was equal to (101.5 %).

  1. Audet, Y., & Chapman, G. H. (2001, October). Design of a self-correcting active pixel sensor. In Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems (pp. 18-26). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DFTVS.2001.966748
  2. Bigas, M., Cabruja, E., Forest, J., & Salvi, J. (2006). Review of CMOS image sensors. Microelectronics Journal, 37(5), 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2005.07.002
  3. Christodouleas, D. C., Nemiroski, A., Kumar, A. A., & Whitesides, G. M. (2015). Broadly available imaging devices enable high-quality low-cost photometry. Analytical chemistry, 87(18), 9170-9178. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01612
  4. Coulombe, J., Sawan, M., & Wang, C. (2000, May). Variable resolution CMOS current mode active pixel sensor. In 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (Vol. 2, pp. 293-296). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2000.856319
  5. Croft, D. (1999). Cmos image sensors compete for low-light tasks. Laser Focus World, 35(1), 135-140.
  6. Durini, D. (Ed.). (2019). High performance silicon imaging: fundamentals and applications of cmos and ccd sensors. Woodhead Publishing.
  7. El Gamal, A., Eltoukhy, H., & Sensors, C. I. (2005). IEEE Circuits& Device Magazine, May. June6―20.
  8. Fossum, E., & Krymski, A. (2000, July). High speed CMOS imaging. In 2000 Digest of the LEOS Summer Topical Meetings. Electronic-Enhanced Optics. Optical Sensing in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Electro-Optics in Space. Broadband Optical Networks (Cat. No. 00TH8497) (pp. I3-I4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LEOSST.2000.869673
  9. Ginhac, D. (2014). Smart cameras on a chip: using complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) image sensors to create smart vision chips. In High Performance Silicon Imaging (pp. 165-188). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097521.1.165
  10. Goy, J., Courtois, B., Karam, J. M., & Pressecq, F. (2001). Design of an APS CMOS image sensor for low light level applications using standard CMOS technology. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 29(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011286415014
  11. Haris, D. C. (2003). Determination of Iron with 1, 10-Phenanthroline. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, 6th ed., WH Freeman & Company, New York, 258-261.
  12. Iqbal, Z., & Eriksson, M. (2013). Classification and quantitative optical analysis of liquid and solid samples using a mobile phone as illumination source and detector. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 185, 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.05.009
  13. Koren, I., Chapman, G., & Koren, Z. (2000, October). A self-correcting active pixel camera. In Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems (pp. 56-64). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DFTVS.2000.886974
  14. Levin, A., & Stevens, P. E. (2014). Summary of KDIGO 2012 CKD Guideline: behind the scenes, need for guidance, and a framework for moving forward. Kidney International, 85(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2013.444
  15. Marczenko, Z., & Balcerzak, M. (2000). Separation, preconcentration and spectrophotometry in inorganic analysis. Elsevier.
  16. Roda, A., Michelini, E., Zangheri, M., Di Fusco, M., Calabria, D., & Simoni, P. (2016). Smartphone-based biosensors: A critical review and perspectives. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 79, 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2015.10.019
  17. Shcherback, I., & Yadid-Pecht, O. (2003). Photoresponse analysis and pixel shape optimization for CMOS active pixel sensors. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 50(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2002.806966
  18. Zhang, W., Chan, M., Wang, H., & Ko, P. K. (1999, October). Building hybrid active pixels for CMOS imager on SOI substrate. In 1999 IEEE International SOI Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No. 99CH36345) (pp. 102-103). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOI.1999.819873
  19. Zhou, Z., Pain, B., & Fossum, E. (1998, February). A CMOS imager with on-chip variable resolution for light-adaptive imaging. In 1998 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers, ISSCC. First Edition (Cat. No. 98CH36156) (pp. 174-175). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC.1998.672422
No citation yet. Please check again later.

Keywords: Iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate, bio sensor, smart-phone, hydroxylamine, 1.10-Phenanthroline, spectrophotometry

Advertisement
How to Cite:
Hussien, M. . A., & Kadhim, H. . H. (2022). Novel Semi-Automated Design for Determination of Iron in Water using Smartphone Camera Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) Biosensor as a Detector Device. Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences, 1(4), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.48112/bcs.v1i4.284
 
Publisher’s Note:
International Research and Publishing Academy (iRAPA) stands neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in the published maps and institutional affiliations.
 
Copyright:
© 2022 Biomedicine and Chemical Sciences published by International Research and Publishing Academy (iRAPA) - Pakistan Co-published by Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University - Iraq
 
This is an Open Access article published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY): lets others distribute and copy the article, to create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation), to include in a collective work (such as an anthology), to text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author's honour or reputation.
Keywords Cloud
DOAJ_logo-colour
OCLC_2016
dimensions
Open_Ukrainian_Citation_Index_logo
Recent Articles